Unable to Come Up with Any Laws Wielding Control Over a Man's Body, Kavanaugh Dismisses Pro-Choice Movement as One Based in 'Feelings'

Punctuated by several protests from Americans expressing deep concerns with Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s anti-choice record and other views, the U.S. Supreme Court nominee’s first day of questioning in his confirmation hearing provoked anger among critics over his statements—and non-answers—on abortion rights.

Early in the proceedings, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked President Donald Trump’s nominee whether he would uphold Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 decision which enshrined American women’s right to abortion care under the U.S. Constitution.

“I don’t want to go back to those death tolls,” Feinstein said, referring to records showing that before Roe, hundreds and sometimes thousands of women died each year from unsafe, illegal abortions and attempts to perform the procedure themselves using knitting needles, coat hangers, and other methods.

“The last two days have underscored, yet again, that if women aren’t at the table, we’re on the menu.” —Cecile Richards, former Planned Parenthood president

Kavanaugh’s response betrayed no understanding of the fact that the more than 140 people who have been arrested so far for protesting at his confirmation hearing have been there to express not their “feelings” about abortion access—but the fear of the tangible impact a major reproductive rights rollback would have on women’s lives and safety.  

“I understand your point of view on that, Senator, and I understand how passionate and how deeply people feel about this issue,” Kavanaugh said. “I understand the importance of the issue, and I understand the importance that people attach to the Roe v. Wade decision.”

Author Jill Filipovic slammed Kavanaugh’s dismissive attempt to dodge the clear issue of whether he would, if confirmed for a lifetime appointment on the high court, protect American women’s right to a legal medical procedure.